Posts Tagged ‘the future of publishing’

Why we will always value print

Wednesday, October 13th, 2010

I was at client meeting today and among other things, we touched on the pros and cons of traditional print placements.  While traditional is inevitably moving towards the all-digital, all-viral, all-social era, my client and I pondered on why we still love reading print.

Sure, there’s the argument of the tangible “leafing through” a magazine at the airport, on the train or waiting at the doctor’s office.  But, there’s more to it, there’s an exclusivity about reading the Sunday paper or your favorite magazine even though you can have 24 access to it online.  For example, I know when I sit down to read TIME I will be focusing on reading and digesting that pub’s information only.  And I look forward to that.

At the same time, I never read TIME.com because I simply do not wish to be distracted by links and pop ups that interrupt my reading.  Knowing that I can instantly search for a million things that I find interesting on the publication’s site is tempting, but not something I seek out when reading certain magazines.

At the same time, I love logging on to www.nytimes.com, but hardly ever read the tangible version of the paper anymore.  NYTimes is a rich source of info that’s constantly updated, and that’s what I look for when sharing information on my social networks

The odd thing is that I do recycle and believe in not wasting paper.  However, there are times when I crave those 20-30 minutes of quiet reading time like the old days, when digesting information was more important than skimming it and virally sharing it before moving onto the next link.  

I believe that both print and online placements have strengths and weaknesses.   Online placements (especially via social media) tend to have a much broader impact in a short period of time.  The question is, how much does that info sticks with you in the long run? 

On the other hand, we are humans and tend to assign value in tangible things - old clippings, front page collectibles, cutting out recipes (I still do that!) and even saving articles for loved ones.   With print pubs, we tend to assign more value in article we spend 15 minutes reading when we would probably just skim its online equivalent, simply because we get far more distracted interacting virtually.

The future of online content

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

Nearly 90% of my work involves some form of writing to service my clients’ business needs.  PR requires a solid writing ability and a very specific skill set of intuitively knowing who will be interested in reading your content and why.

Part of my work also involves monitoring the news environment, which has almost completely moved to online from the traditional print pubs.  It used to be where online content would supplement print.  The publishing crisis changed all of that, and now I would safely say that it’s the other way around.  In today’s world, print articles are outdated the minute they are published, and therefore they have become pretty showpieces of a nostalgic past where flipping pages was more satisfying than scrolling down to “read more” on a screen.  The need and the capability to immediately comment on articles sealed the deal for print pubs.  Period.

Clearly, the publishing crisis has impacted all of the IMC components, with a particular emphasis on PR.   Nowadays, I scan so many websites for content, I’m baffled with how many “experts” there are posting articles such as, “5 key points to…,” or ”7 trends to monitor…” and so on.  Everyone has become a reporter of some kind, but the ability and the skill to write is absent in too many of these mainstream, mislabeled, yet keyword-rich articles.  There’s so much to sift through, and absorb, it makes me wonder: what will content look like by 2020?

In 2010, we know that social media will drive content, and social networks are likely to continue dictating what is actually being read and absorbed, versus simply skimmed and shared. 

Big questions to ask:

1) Is quality of content gradually becoming more important in the face of the infinite amount of regurgitated content that just reads a little differently than the previous post?   

2) If content is closely tied to social media, what does that say about the future of the fickle three: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn?  Can we get enough quality content through these social networks so that they continue to be credible sources of information, as much as they have become marketing tools? 

3)  What is the next step once we reach the point of content saturation?  We all love informative articles that can help us shape opinions, and start conversations.  What happens when the online content world becomes too cluttered to make a real impact? 

I think that one of the issues is that too much content is free.   We’re noticing that some news sites are planning to start charging for readership in the next year or so.  If charging for content becomes mainstream, then it will be interesting to see how that will change the content world as we know it today.