An old article in INC. touched on this topic and inspired the blog post (though I keep reading about the issue in other outlets since then).
Several times throughout my career as a PR practitioner I have received inquiries from prospective clients wanting to hire me on a pay-per-placement arrangement. In such a project, the PR person and the client develop a wish list of media to land a story/mention/feature in, and depending on the success of securing that placement, PR gets paid.
The downfall is that your effort could be for nothing… you could be trying to land a story in the NY Times and the editor just won’t bite, because it’s not the right fit (even though your client thinks it is!). Or, worst -this has happened to me- the story gets pulled out at layout because of lack of space. So, you’ve wasted weeks of effort, and you’re not getting paid for your time, or your frustration. Hmm, no thank you.
I tried that approach when I first started out on my own, and stopped accepting such ridiculous projects. I work with a continuous strategy in mind, not a piecemeal messaging approach. Indeed, companies should see results from retainer-based PR professionals. However, if I’m spending 25 hours a week thinking about a business, coming up with angles, ideas, new ways to approach a message, or making shifts in the communications strategy, why on earth would I do that for free?
Perhaps there some cases where pay-for-press might make sense (e.g., a very specific type of product of service), but even those can backfire. Suppose you land the story in Newsweek as expected. Now, the client has to pay you, say, 15K for the placement. What now? What’s the next step in the PR process? How do you take that placement and move forward with the PR strategy now that it’s reached a new level? Oh, that’s right, you’re not getting paid to think about that. On the other hand, you could have been on retainer for six months with that 15K, and earned not only the Newsweek story, but lots of other placements - big or small. You could have created momentum for your client, not a one hit wonder. Not to mention, you’d have a PR plan to follow… and a predictable payment schedule.
It’s not a case of “are you a pro, or an amateur?’ It’s how you approach your business as a PR person and how you value your own effort when you service a client. And clients who pay-for-placement in many cases have high expectations (as they should), but very low budgets.
PR is a process and an important communications investment, and best not ordered à la carte.
Respect our profession. Build your own menu carefully with thought as a chef would, don’t just prep a dish.
Share on Facebook