<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When PR is one-sided: propaganda?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://didilutzpr.com/blog/2009/10/when-pr-is-one-sided-propaganda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://didilutzpr.com/blog/2009/10/when-pr-is-one-sided-propaganda/</link>
	<description>Exploring the Truth in Public Relations</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 18:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://didilutzpr.com/blog/2009/10/when-pr-is-one-sided-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://didilutzpr.com/blog/?p=171#comment-782</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post. This debate over neutrality and PR can be applied to farmers like to powerful organisations, politics or anyone using large communication means. Think of how many people in the audience listened passively, without the ability to step back like you did, and went away to spread the message to their relatives... !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post. This debate over neutrality and PR can be applied to farmers like to powerful organisations, politics or anyone using large communication means. Think of how many people in the audience listened passively, without the ability to step back like you did, and went away to spread the message to their relatives&#8230; !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

